🔗 Share this article

As any prominent prize-giving event approaches, one notices an outcry to include of new categories to recognize overlooked contributions and fill the spirits of followers dedicated to specific genres.

A fellow writer previously argued advocating for terror-themed awards. That would rule. So would tabletop games, this being a dedicated supporter's campaign. Yet I need to apologize in advance for pushing forward since similar to dedicated enthusiasts, there's a strong justification supporting my request remains most pressing and important of all. This is the request: It's essential to create a classification for brain-teasing titles.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Categorizing art by genre defies precise measurement; it remains highly personal, and typically generate discussions concluding with vague boundaries. This explains why cinema institutions don’t do it. Yet it remains a necessary evil for the industry of video games, which are so diverse it's challenging to consider them one unified medium.

For the full spectrum of achievement in video games to gain proper attention, and to ensure all game types to have a chance for representation, classification by type becomes crucial.

Current Gaming Award Categories

Leading game ceremonies presently include genre categories for Action, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Together, these classifications successfully include numerous genres, allowing placement for numerous titles.

Different situation exists for brain-teasing titles. No suitable classification appears to accommodate them. Think about these recent excellent titles, each quite distinct: the architectural riddles in a particular game, fast-paced pattern recognition from another release, engaging interpersonal challenges of a third title. Where could they possibly go within current classifications? Unfortunately, nowhere.

Acknowledgment Issues

Many instances occur of brilliant puzzle games launched regularly lacking appropriate categories at major award shows, except when they manage to fit award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive small studio competitions.

• A renowned logic title received no recognition for anything during that awards season
• Another creative title missed out during that ceremony
• Well-received sorting experience received no acknowledgment recently
• Only a few puzzle games managed to sneak into niche award types

Significance of Puzzle Games

Commonly they're small games, yet the craft of the puzzle game is of massive significance. Well-known matching games count as most engaged experiences in the world maintaining this status for over a decade.

The legendary block-stacking game competes with well-known building titles competing to become highest-selling title ever; it also contends for best game of all time. Puzzle games are foundational for gaming as medium, and they are in conversation with diverse game types.

The Solution and Justification

Logic titles wouldn't face that issue. You could fill a field of five engaging, different, qualified experiences each ceremony simply — perhaps, with difficulty, since numerous excellent so many good games out.

Restating the point, these are games lacking appropriate categories at major gaming awards. Puzzle game makers function at the challenging frontier of video game design, creating some of essential manifestations of the video game form. Similar to cinema stunt performers, they warrant appreciation. Don't make them wait 35 years.